Context
In 2014 eBay had began a concerted and costly effort to rebrand its public image. At the heart of this strategy was to distance itself from the being commonly perceived as a marketplace for “used goods”. This call for action had been prompted by a stream of compelling industry data showing the pressing need for this remodel. Among the factors was profitability data, where eBay’s and Amazon’s financial outlook vectors were rapidly approaching an intersection point. Predictably, there were investor pressures directed at influencing eBay’s overarching strategy and the urgent need to re-think our public image and consumer perception.
Being deeply involved in the product development and roadmapping, I saw long-term risks with the way eBay approached the execution of this strategy. One of them was the active promotion of all things new at all L1 nodes at the great expense of multiple categories including Art and Collectibles. Entire modules and sections that had long given eBay its unique market positioning had begun to disappear. The home page was quickly filled with compelling imagery of attractive new tech and items listed as “new in box” began to dominate the search experience.
This was the time when I realized that eBay is in danger of losing its one-of-a-kind character and identity. While I supported all efforts in righting the revenue outlook, I proposed that we do it in a more thoughtful and sensible way. I have actively pushed against the active suppression of a number of eBay’s traditional categories and made a case where they could be repositioned and effectively support the new direction from a specific angle. My goal was to remind my partners and the leadership that eBay is not one thing. That is infinitely more that just another glossy storefront for common mass-produced goods. That our ability to compete long-term was rooted in retaining the “soul” of the company and it’s origins.